Legal Opinion

Access Biologicals, LLC v. XPO Logistics, LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 9, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01964Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 ACCESS BIOLOGICALS, LLC, No. 2:19-cv-01964-JAM-DB 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER 17 XPO LOGISTICS, LLC, 18 Defendant. 19 20 Access Biologicals, LLC (“Access”) filed suit against XPO 21 Logistics, LLC (“XPOL”) in September 2019. Compl., ECF No. 1. 22 Access alleges XPOL’s improper delivery of an order of fetal 23 bovine serum amounted to negligence, a breach of contract, and a 24 violation of the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706. Compl. 25 ¶¶ 18-59.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. R.A. Argueta, Husband Mary Argueta, Wife Grupo Sal Corporation v. Banco Mexicano, S.A. Francisco Suarez Davila Alonso Cuevas Del VillarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Lennar Mare Island, LLC v. Steadfast InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API