Legal Opinion

Jeckell v. Fried

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Third District Court of New Orleans,

1Opinion of the CourtLosley, J.

The plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the defendant, by virtue of an execution in the suit of George Jeckell v. (No. 17,504) Jacob Fried, caused to be seized as the property of the defendant, a certain cracker machine, which the defendant, Fried, had purchased from one Sturne ; Sturne being indebted to one Beard in the sum of four hundred dollars, it was agreed among the parties, that Fried, the purchaser, should execute his note, as part of the price of the cracker machine, for the amount due to Beard. This note having been transferred to one Daniel Sheehan, he intervened in the said suit,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Wallace Lincolnmercury Company, Inc., Bankrupt, Ford Motor Credit Company v. Herschel A. Gentry, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Cottonport Bank v. DunnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API