Legal Opinion

Mississippi Medicaid Pharmaceutical Average Wholesale Price Litigation v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2015No. 2012-CA-01610-SCTPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHANDLER, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. The State of Mississippi brought a civil-action against generic pharmaceutical provider Sandoz, Inc., (Sandoz) alleging that Sandoz impermissibly exploited Mississippi’s Medicaid reimbursement program by routinely and exponentially reporting fictitious / “Average Wholesale Prices,” a key data factor in the federally supervised formula used by the Mississippi Division of Medicaid to reimburse pharmacies serviced by Sandoz. The trial court, sitting as fact-finder, found Sandoz in violation of the Mississippi Consumer Protection Act and liable for common-law…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Cotton v. McConnellMississippi Supreme Court · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Watson Laboratories, Inc. v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Mississippi Valley Silica Company, Inc. v. Dorothy BarnettCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  4. Kenneth Moore v. Roy D. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  5. Ali Almasri v. Mississippi Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API