Legal Opinion

Martin v. Marr

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Stonewall. Tried below before Hon. P. D. Sanders.

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Associate Justice.

Appellant brought this suit against appellee on February .36, 1900, in trespass to try title to recover the north quarter of section 144, block D, Houston & Texas Central Railroad survey, set apart to public free schools, situated in Stonewall County. The appelee pleaded not guilty. The case was tried by the court, and judgment was rendered for appellee, and it comes here by appeal on a statement of facts, as well as conclusions of fact and law found by the district judge.

The evidence was sufficient to entitle Martin to recover the land as additional grazing land to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. De Shazo v. EubankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Davis v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Briggs v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Price v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  5. De Shazo v. EubankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API