Harbuck v. Ramos
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs instituted this suit against defendants to recover damages for personal injuries, doctor and medical bills, and automobile damages incurred by plaintiffs as a result of being struck from the rear by defendant’s automobile while plaintiffs’ automobile was stopped at a red light. Defendant filed a general denial, but prior to trial admitted liability. Trial was on damages only, and was to a jury. The jury, in answer to issues submitted, found:
1) The value of plaintiffs’ automobile immediately prior to the collision was $525.
2) The value of plaintiffs’…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Royal v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Smith v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Sherrill v. Estate of PlumleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Rosenblum v. BloomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Ruffo v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.