Sipes v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLowdermilk, J.
The defendants-appellant, Dexter Sipes and Ronnie Lloyd, were charged by separate affidavits and the trials were consolidated and they were tried together for the offense of theft under Ind. Ann. Stat., § 10-3030 (Burns 1971 Cum. Supp.), which reads, in part, as follows, to-wit:
“Theft in general.—A person commits theft when he (1) knowingly:(a) obtains or exerts unauthorized control over property of the owner; or
* * *(2) either:(a) intends to deprive the owner of the use or benefit of the property; or
* *
Prior to the trial of this cause by jury two other men, namely, Clarence Francis and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ashton v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Valentine v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nasser v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Carter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. QuackenbushIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Thomas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Thomas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977