Legal Opinion

Sipes v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1973No. 1-972A60PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLowdermilk, J.

The defendants-appellant, Dexter Sipes and Ronnie Lloyd, were charged by separate affidavits and the trials were consolidated and they were tried together for the offense of theft under Ind. Ann. Stat., § 10-3030 (Burns 1971 Cum. Supp.), which reads, in part, as follows, to-wit:

“Theft in general.—A person commits theft when he (1) knowingly:(a) obtains or exerts unauthorized control over property of the owner; or

* * *(2) either:(a) intends to deprive the owner of the use or benefit of the property; or

* *

Prior to the trial of this cause by jury two other men, namely, Clarence Francis and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ashton v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Valentine v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nasser v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Carter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. QuackenbushIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Thomas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Thomas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API