Greene v. St. Louis County
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSER, Commissioner.
• St. Louis County formulated plans and .commenced to widen and rebuild a segment of Florissant Road on the assumption that it had a 100-foot right of way. The owners of 21 tracts of land abutting on that segment of Florissant Road contended that the county had only a 60-foot 'right of way; that they owned and for years had used' and occupied the 20-foot strip on each side of the 60-foot right of way and that the county had no right to deprive them of their property without exercising the right of eminent domain. A controversy ensued which resulted in 'the filing of this…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ells v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Beetschen v. Shell Pipe Line Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- La Presto v. La PrestoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Lingo v. BurfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cherry v. City of Hayti HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Harris v. L. P. & H. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Nika Corp. v. City of Kansas City, Mo.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- STATE EX INF. VOIGTS, ETC. v. City of Pleasant ValleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. JensenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.