Legal Opinion

Otero v. New York City Housing Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question should be answered in the affirmative.

Plaintiff filed a summons and complaint in 1994. An index number previously secured and paid for by plaintiff with respect to his late-notice-of-claim application, was assigned to the action. In 1997, at the request of the County Clerk, plaintiff purchased a second index number, which was then re-assigned to the action.

Defendant moved to dismiss the action on the ground that plaintiff “never filed the summons and complaint pursuant…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. Niagara Falls Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API