Legal Opinion

United States v. Fuentes-Lozano

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 9, 1979No. 78-5202PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants were convicted on two counts of conspiracy to import and conspiracy to distribute a large quantity of marijuana. In this appeal they have raised several points that relate to alleged ineffectiveness of trial counsel. The court pointed out at oral argument that ineffectiveness of coun*553sel in a federal case is ordinarily presented under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and that the record now before the court may not be complete enough for an adequate determination of the issue.1 Thereafter, appellants have, by letter to the court, withdrawn their points I, II and III, and wish to reserve the right…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Jamie Barrera Lopez, Eugenio Ozuna Ramirez, Jr., Eliseo De La Garza, and Robert San-Martin DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Joseph A. SivigliaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Richard Claude Curry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Fuentes-LozanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Joseph A. SivigliaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API