Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Connor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 8, 2006No. 5D05-3994Published

1ConcurrenceSawaya, J.

I present this concurring opinion to explain why I believe the crime victim in this case is entitled to restitution and to explain why the procedure initially employed by the trial judge to determine the amount of restitution should not be condoned.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Jacqueline Connor entered a plea of guilty to the charge of robbery in exchange for a sentence of 18 months’ probation and payment of restitution to the victim. The plea was entered and Connor was sentenced on August 31, 2005. When the sentence was imposed, the trial judge ordered restitution as a condition of Connor’s…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. SLT Warehouse Company v. WebbSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Florida Dept. of Transp. v. JulianoSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  3. Kippy Corporation v. ColburnSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  4. Augustin v. Blount, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. State v. SandersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API