Legal Opinion

International Bank v. Bowen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1875PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. E. S. Williams, Judge, presiding. This was a bill in chancery, by the International Bank of Chicago, against James H. Bowen, Ira Holmes and others, to foreclose a deed of trust. The material facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Soholeield

The purpose of this appeal is, to procure the reversal of a decree of the court below refusing to foreclose a certain deed of trust, and dismissing the bill at the complainant’s costs.

The instrument, of which foreclosure is prayed, was executed by James H. Bowen to Henry M. K'etchum, as trustee, on the west 53-¡- acres (or one-third) of the north-west quarter of section 10, township 37 north, range 14 east of the third principal meridian, in Cook county, to secure the payment of two promissory notes for $5000 each, executed by the said Bowen on the 9th day of June, 1871, payable to himself or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Olds v. CummingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Kleeman v. FrisbieIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Household Finance Company, Inc. v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Marks v. PopeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. Miller v. MerineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1890
  5. Siegel, Cooper & Co. v. ColbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API