Legal Opinion

Eddleman v. Eddleman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 26, 1936No. 25306PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

At common law a husband and wife, in legal fiction, are one person; and the common law is of force in Georgia, except where changed by the statute law of this State; and under the common law neither could maintain against the other a suit based on a tort. Heyman v. Heyman, 19 Ga. App. 634 (93 S. E. 35); Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Cheney, 20 Ga. App. 393 (93 S. E. 43); Code of 1933, § 53-501; 65 C. J. 73, § 119. In the instant case a husband brought an action in trover against his wife, from whom he was living separately, to recover a ring. However, the relation of husband and wife existed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heyman v. HeymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Chastain v. ChastainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Hicks v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. CheneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Laurens Cotton Co. v. American Trust & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eddleman v. EddlemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Carmichael v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Bradley v. Tenneco Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Eddleman v. EddlemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API