Eddleman v. Eddleman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
At common law a husband and wife, in legal fiction, are one person; and the common law is of force in Georgia, except where changed by the statute law of this State; and under the common law neither could maintain against the other a suit based on a tort. Heyman v. Heyman, 19 Ga. App. 634 (93 S. E. 35); Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Cheney, 20 Ga. App. 393 (93 S. E. 43); Code of 1933, § 53-501; 65 C. J. 73, § 119. In the instant case a husband brought an action in trover against his wife, from whom he was living separately, to recover a ring. However, the relation of husband and wife existed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heyman v. HeymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Chastain v. ChastainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Hicks v. MoyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. CheneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Laurens Cotton Co. v. American Trust & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eddleman v. EddlemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Carmichael v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Bradley v. Tenneco Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Eddleman v. EddlemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937