Legal Opinion

State v. Canton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1989No. Nos. 56757, 56874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

The State has appealed, pursuant to Sec. 547.200.1 RSMo 1986, from orders by two different trial judges sustaining each defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized by the Fredericktown Police Department. Defendant Canton was charged with misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance — marihuana. Defendant Keer was charged with felony possession of a controlled substance — marihuana. We denied the state’s motion to consolidate the cases but we choose to dispose of both cases in a single opinion.

The evidence suppressed was the marihuana and paraphenalia for smoking…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Missouri v. WelchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. State v. VanackerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. PayneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hagood v. Town of Town CreekCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. State v. TiptonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Wellner v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. STACY BIGGERSTAFFMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API