Legal Opinion

Marx v. The Trinacria

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 28, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The libel was filed to recover damages for the loss of glyc-erine in transportation from Genoa to New York. One hundred and sixteen drums were shipped, five of which were found on delivery to show cuts in the drums, through which more or less of the glycerine had escaped. The vessel was a British vessel, and the bills of lading excepted loss through negligence by any person in theo service of the.ship, loss from leakage, stowage, or peril of the seas. Both the English and the Italian laws sustain these exceptions as valid. As the contract was made in Italy by an English master of an English…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oceanic Steam Nav. Co. v. CorcoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. Botany Worsted Mills v. KnottDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1896
  3. The New EnglandDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1901
  4. Botany Worsted Mills v. KnottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  5. Baetjer v. La Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API