People v. Hernandez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. LeonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. SahadeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.