Legal Opinion

Celotex Corp. v. Andren

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1996No. 95-250PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellee Melvin Andren (the employee) sought review in the district court of the hearing examiner’s order which denied his request for worker’s compensation benefits. The district court reversed the hearing examiner’s order, finding that the employee was entitled to receive benefits. Appellant Celotex Corporation (the employer) appeals from the district court’s order which reversed the hearing examiner’s decision.

We reverse.

ISSUES

The employer presents the following issues for our review:

1. The District Court applied an incorrect standard or rule and improperly reweighed the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Devous v. Wyoming State Board of Medical ExaminersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Latimer v. Rissler & McMurry Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. StudyWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. FisherWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Worker's Compensation Claim of Forni v. Pathfinder MinesWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. BP America Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Vaughan v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dunning v. AnkneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. JM v. Department of Family ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Williams Production RMT Company v. STATE OF WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF REVENUEWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API