Mitchell v. Toole
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtBryan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It is contended by the assignments of error that appellee’s wife, Sallie Toole, was not a competent witness; that the judgment rendered in the proceedings before the justice of the peace constitutes res judicata; and that there is not sufficient evidence to sustain the decree. It is of no consequence that the conveyance is in form a warranty deed. Parol evidence was admissible to show that in reality it is a mortgage. Bolin v. Wilkes, 249 Fed. 705, 161 C. C. A. 615.
*28 We do not think the court erred in admitting the testimony of Sallie Toole, even assuming…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson v. PeacockMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
- Scott v. ScottMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
- Massey v. WombleMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- Bolin v. WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ver Straten v. WorthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- First Nat. Bank of Atlanta v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- Pifer v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019