Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Toole

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1923No. 3950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryan, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It is contended by the assignments of error that appellee’s wife, Sallie Toole, was not a competent witness; that the judgment rendered in the proceedings before the justice of the peace constitutes res judicata; and that there is not sufficient evidence to sustain the decree. It is of no consequence that the conveyance is in form a warranty deed. Parol evidence was admissible to show that in reality it is a mortgage. Bolin v. Wilkes, 249 Fed. 705, 161 C. C. A. 615.

*28 We do not think the court erred in admitting the testimony of Sallie Toole, even assuming…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PeacockMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Scott v. ScottMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Massey v. WombleMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bolin v. WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ver Straten v. WorthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. First Nat. Bank of Atlanta v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  3. Pifer v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API