Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 8310SC454Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether there is competent evidence to support the hearing officer’s findings of fact and conclusions of law adopted by the Commission which are based on the assumption that petitioner’s store and the recreation center were in fact only one business, and not two separate businesses. The findings of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission, after proper hearing, are conclusive if supported by competent, material and substantial evidence. See C’est Bon, Inc. v. *641Board of Alcoholic Control, 279 N.C. 140, 146, 181 S.E. 2d 448, 451-52 (1971);…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Keg, Inc. v. State Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. C'est Bon, Inc. v. NORTH CAROLINA BD. OF ALCOHOLIC CON.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Parker v. Board of Alcoholic ControlCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API