Horn v. State

Appellant was convicted of the offense of being in possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing alcoholic liquor.

His counsel have filed on this appeal an excellent brief, which has been of gz;eat benefit to us in arriving at our conclusions.

The general admission in evidence of the affidavit and warrant, made and issued against the defendant before his arrest, was not proper, and we hold that their admission as in this case, without the purpose for which they were admitted being properly limited, was error. Moseley v. State, 19 Ala. App. 589, 99 So. 657. This…