Legal Opinion · Dissent

Collateral Liquidation, Inc. v. Manning

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1939No. Docket No. 15, Calendar No. 40,150Published

1DissentWiest, J.

This is an action in assumpsit upon a promissory note executed by a married woman and secured by mortgage upon her real estate.

For want of proof of consideration, bringing right of recovery under the provisions of the married women’s act (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13057 [Stat. Ann. § 26.161]), the court entered judgment for defendant.

The mortgage is not here involved. Appeal is by plaintiff and right to have recovery without proof of such consideration is claimed under the following provision of the negotiable instruments law (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9273 [Stat. Ann. § 19.66]):

“Every negotiable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manistee National Bank v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Judd v. JuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Cawthorpe v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. McQuillan v. EckersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Monroe State Savings Bank v. OrloffMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API