Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maguire v. Osborne

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1956No. Appeal, 204Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Ópínion by

Mr. Justice Bell:

The majority opinion gives, unintentionally of course,, a completely distorted pictui’é of the facts, and consequently reaches an unjustifiable conclusion;

*442Lawrence H. Maguire, husband of the plaintiff, was manager of the business of Fibreflex Packing and Manufacturing Co. At his death on March 3, 1946, he owned 12 shares of Fibreflex stock which he left to plaintiff. The stock was then appraised at $450. The corporation had outstanding 40 shares of stock of which Mrs. Scheer owned 28 shares. Mrs. Scheer died in July, 1947, and her nephew, Arthur Osborne,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lutherland, Inc. v. DahlenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Todd v. SkellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. East Girard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HoulihanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Kelly, Murray, Inc. v. Lansdowne Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Sheasley TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API