Ideal Clothing Co. v. Hazle
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Clinton; Daboll, J. Bill by the Ideal Clothing Company and others against Fred E. Hazle and Frank B. Clark, copartners as Hazle & Clark, and others, to set aside certain conveyances and for an injunction. From an order overruling a demurrer to the bill, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
Hazle & Clark, copartners, carried on a shoe business in Ovid. The complainants sold them goods, and were severally their creditors. Their bill of complaint, filed on or about September 18, 1898, at which time a temporary injunction was allowed, states their *264various claims, and that, with the exception of $33, they were not due. It alleges further that the persons composing the firm of Hazle & Clark pretended to sell and delivered their stock to one Lamb, and conveyed their lands to their wives; all in fraud of creditors. It alleges also that they were insolvent, and that on the preceding 1st…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jenks v. HortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Shaw v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Turck v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Vietor v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Kerr v. RuppMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Berry v. FriedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Ellis v. L. Hays Saddlery & Leather Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902