Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Tankersley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1951No. 12164PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

We heretofore affirmed the judgment of the trial court upon condition that appel-lee file a remittitur. Both parties have filed motions for rehearing. The motion of appellant has been considered and is overruled. However, we are of the opinion that we erred in requiring appellee to remit a portion of the judgment awarded to him by the trial court. Appellee’s motion is granted and the judgment appealed from is in all things affirmed. The following will •be substituted in lieu of the original opinion as and for the opinion of this Court.

This is an appeal from a judgment for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Belcher v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Thompson v. Lee Roy Crawford Produce Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Lee Roy Crawford Produce Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. Trautmann BrothersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Texas and New Orleans Railroad Co. v. H. Rouw Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Thompson v. A. J. Tebbe & Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Thompson v. Bob Tankersley Produce CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. HillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API