Legal Opinion · Dissent

Collins v. Townsend

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 6,669Published

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant in the Twenty-third District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Thornton, J.

1DissentThornton, J.

I dissent. This action was brought to recover a balance alleged to be due on a promissory note given for the purchase money of certain shares of stock by defendant to plaintiff. The defendant set up several defenses to the action, which, as far as material, will be noticed hereafter. Judgment passed for the defendant, and plaintiff appealed.

There was no attempt made to rescind the contract. We do not understand the respondent to urge that the contract was rescinded, or that the judgment of the Court below should be upheld on any such ground. But he contends that there is nothing due on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kimball v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Whitney v. AllaireNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Miller v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Burton v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  5. Gifford v. CarvillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API