Legal Opinion

Radzinski v. Radzinski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 12PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiff and defendant were married in 1901, and lived together until December, 1922. In the bill for divorce, filed by her herein, she alleges repeated acts of extreme cruelty on his part. In his answer defendant denies such allegations, and by cross-bill charges extreme cruelty on her part, and prays that a divorce be granted to him. The trial court concluded that both of the parties were at fault, and dismissed the bill and cross-bill. Plaintiff appeals.

In Kellogg v. Kellogg, 171 Mich. 518, this court, speaking through Mr. Justice Stone, emphasized the salutary rule theretofore laid…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoff v. HoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hatfield v. HatfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Kellogg v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Legatski v. LegatskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Cowdrey v. CowdreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buck v. BuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Kauk v. KaukMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Rice v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. McGuire v. McGuireMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Bechtol v. BechtolMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API