Scott v. . Harrison
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentClarkson, J.
The concluding statement of the opinion in the former appeal was, “Plaintiff will be given reasonable time to amend her complaint, if she so desires. The judgment overruling the demurrer is reversed.” In my opinion, both the plaintiff and the judge below were correct in interpreting this as an order of this Court permitting plaintiff to amend. The words' are plain, clear and positive. Nor are they, in my opinion, altered in meaning by the sentence preceding the quoted statement, as that sentence merely distinguished the ease under consideration from an earlier case. As the sentence quoted…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bank v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Pretzfelder v. Merchants Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Harrington v. Rawls.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- First National Bank of Springfield v. Asheville Furniture & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Betts v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.