Legal Opinion

Dyer v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 21, 1933No. 6863Published

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action on a war risk insurance policy issued to Omey E. Dyer, herein referred to as the decedent. On motion of the defendant, appellee, the learned trial court instructed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. “My analysis of the testimony in this case,” said the court, “is that the plaintiff has not shown that he in fact became totally and permanently disabled between the date of the issuance of the policy until the time it elapsed, as required by the policy and the law; that there is no evidence, as I view it, at all…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. United States v. McGillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Green v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API