Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS Ex Rel JOHNSON v. SILVER DOLLAR CAFE

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1992No. 91348, (Calendar No. 3)Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRiley, J.

I agree with the majority that the Court of Appeals erred in its evaluation of this case. I disagree, however, with the analysis provided.

*132At the heart of this dispute are two provisions governing the scope of judicial review of decisions made by the Civil Rights Commission. Const 1963, art 5, § 29 provides that "[ajppeals from final orders of the commission . . . shall be tried de novo before the circuit court having jurisdiction provided by law.” (Emphasis added.) The Legislature, however, has provided that "[a]n appeal [of decisions made by the Civil Rights Commission] before the circuit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Locricchio v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Eide v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API