Legal Opinion

United States v. Xcl Resources Holdings, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 4, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-0041Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-cv-41 (TSC) XCL RESOURCES HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States initiated this action against Defendants XCL Resources Holdings, LLC (“XCL”), XCL’s sister company, Verdun Oil Company II LLC (“Verdun”), and EP Energy LLC (“EP”) for antitrust violations arising out of XCL and Verdun’s acquisition of EP. The United States alleged that Defendants violated Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18a, commonly known as the Hart-Scott-Rodino…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Microsoft Corporation. United States of America v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  2. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. United States v. Iron Mountain, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  5. United States v. US Airways Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API