Glaeser v. Acacia Mut. Life Ass'n
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
The defendant, a resident of the District of Columbia, moved to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff, a resident of California. Jurisdiction is asserted on the basis of diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(1). Section 41(1) was amended April 20, 1940, whereby jurisdiction of the district courts was extended to actions between citizens of the District of Columbia, Territory of Hawaii or Alaska and any state or territory. The motion to dismiss rests on the ground that the foregoing amendment is unconstitutional in that it contravenes Article III, Section 2…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hepburn & Dundas v. EllzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- McGarry v. City of BethlehemDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Winkler v. DanielsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1942
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Behlert v. James Foundation of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- Central States Co-Ops. v. Watson Bros. Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Ostrow v. Samuel Brilliant Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1946
- Wilson v. GuggenheimDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.