Legal Opinion

Brown v. C. Rosenstein Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

Motion for summary judgment, under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The plaintiffs are copartners carrying on *789business as bankers under the firm name of Brown Brothers & Company. Plaintiff’s complaint for a first cause of action alleges: On or about the 26th day of August, 1922, at defendant’s request they issued a letter of credit authorizing Georges Yemian, of Varna, Bulgaria, to draw upon plaintiffs at three months’ sight for account of defendant for any sum or sums not exceeding in all $4,500 for eighty-five per cent cost of merchandise to be shipped to New York, the bills to bo…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Dwan v. MassareneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Littlejohn v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Frey & Son, Inc. v. E. R. Sherburne Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sztejn v. J. Henry Schroder Banking Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. First Trust & Savings Bank of Zanesville, Ohio v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust CoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
  3. Dulien Steel Products, Inc. of Wash. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API