Cox v. Game

GRIMES, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment which settled a boundary dispute between the parties in favor of appellees.

The controversy arose because the section of land in question was not of standard size in that it contained less than 640 acres. A careful analysis of the deeds in the two chains of title convinces us that the court properly ruled that appellees are the titleholders of the disputed land. No purpose would be served to further discuss this point.

The other point on appeal, which concerns appellants’ adverse possession claim, merits more detailed consideration. In…