Legal Opinion

Jimenez v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 8, 1990No. 1314-88-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOON, J.

The principle issue in this case is whether the evidence was sufficient to prove that Eddie Allen Jimenez was guilty of grand larceny in violation of Code § 18.2-200.1 and Code § 18.2-95 by failing “to substantially make good” advances of money for construction. Jimenez maintains that he could not be convicted under this code provision because he, in fact, expended more money on the contract than he was paid. We disagree and affirm because the evidence was sufficient to prove that Jimenez fraudulently took at least two advances of money in excess of $200 for which he promised…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. Mounce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  3. Norman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  4. Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  5. Spitzli v. MinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jimenez v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  2. People v. VelingMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. MarkvaFairfax County Circuit Court · 1994
  4. People v. VelingMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API