Legal Opinion

United States v. Allen

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 26, 1990No. ACM 27848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MURDOCK, Judge:

The appellant was found guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of six specifications of taking indecent liberties with six different girls under the age of 16. Now he asserts two errors. We find no merit in either one.

First, the appellant asserts that the military judge erred by denying his challenge for cause against a female court member. At trial, and again before us, the appellant argued that the member’s long-term association with Girl Scouts, including her present role as a Brownie leader “showed a predisposition and a favoritism toward young girls”. The judge and both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. TowersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. ChavesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. EdwardsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. GibsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. LadellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. WeddleU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  5. United States v. WeddleU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API