Legal Opinion

Lenhart v. Cambria County

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1906No. Appeal, No. 68PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 68, Oct. T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Ct., April T., 1905, No. 179, reversing judgment of C. P. Cambria Co., June T., 1904, No. 410, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Samuel Len-hart v. Cambria County. Appeal from the Superior Court. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court and by the report in 29 Pa. Superior Ct. 350. JError assigned was the judgment of the Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

Plaintiff’s claim in this case was for removing certain prisoners, in pursuance of sentences and orders of the court, from the jail of Cambria county to the Western Penitentiary, the Dixmont Insane Asylum, the Polk Institute and the Hunting-don Reformatory, respectively. For these services he claimed fees under the Act of July 11,1901, P. L. 663, as follows: six cents per mile for each mile actually traveled by each prisoner ; ten cents per mile circular for each mile actually traveled or necessary to be traveled by plaintiff himself in case each sentence were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. MathuesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Bank of Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852
  3. County of Cumberland v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Southwark Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  5. Peeling v. York CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Platek v. PlatekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Cogan v. Bedford CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Andrews v. County of LawrenceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Kerr v. Sun Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API