Sam W. Masten, P. C. v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of America
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
NICHOL, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs seek to recover damages from the defendant for its alleged breach of contract. The following memorandum decision constitutes this court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to F.R. Civ.P. 52. For the reasons stated herein the court finds in favor of the plaintiffs.
One of the plaintiffs, Sam Masten, individually, is a well known, highly regarded attorney who has practiced law in the State of South Dakota for over 30 years. In the Fall of 1976, he was practicing law as a solo practitioner. For a number of reasons, he became…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Zehren v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Roby v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Wilson v. Allstate Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Bergstreser v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- South Dakota Medical Service, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- South Dakota Medical Service, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981