Legal Opinion

Holt v. Tennallytown & Rockville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 4, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of non prosequi entered in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County.

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case must be overruled, for it appears from the affidavits filed that the delay in transmitting the transcript of record to this Court was the fault of the Clerk of the Court below.

The plaintiff, having been injured as he alleges, by the *220negligence of the defendant, a railroad corporation, he instituted an action in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County to recover damages. Issue having been joined, the defendant suggested that the plaintiff was a non-resident, and asked the Court to place him under a rule security for costs, which .was accordingly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haney v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
  2. Spencer v. TraffordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Heinekamp v. BeatyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Knee v. Baltimore City Passenger Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  3. Greenberg v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Gerace v. BentleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  5. Ravenel v. DekleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API