Legal Opinion · Dissent

Erickson ex rel. Erickson v. Hammermeister

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 1990No. C2-89-1940Published

1DissentNorton, Judge

I would reverse and remand for a new trial on damages. The trial court’s findings strongly support a much larger addi-tur than was granted. Specifically, the court found:

Young Catherine was sitting next to the dog, when the dog, twice her size, turned and bit her in the face. After the bite, Catherine was running around the yard screaming, with blood over her face and dress. She was rushed to the Emergency Room still crying, and underwent surgery.

Here, the jury’s verdict is inadequate based on the evidence and appears to be a result of passion or prejudice. The verdict was not within the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seydel v. ReuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Kloos v. Soo Line RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API