Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Botto

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 19, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSenter, J.

The parties will be referred to as in the court below, Mrs. Carrie Bishop, plaintiff, and V. F. Botto, defendant; Henry-Bishop, plaintiff, and V. F. Botto, defendant.

Henry Bishop is the son of Mrs. Carrie Bishop, and lived with her where she occupied a part of the house known as 678 Poplar Avenue, in Memphis, as the tenant.

The declaration alleges in substance that they were both seriously injured as the result of an explosion. We quote from the portion of the declaration of Henry Bishop which sets forth the cause of action, and is substantially the same as set forth in the declaration of Mrs.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willcox v. HinesTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Stenberg v. WillcoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Schmalzried v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Dyer v. RobinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tedder v. RaskinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  2. Northwest States Utilities Co. v. AshtonWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Silcox v. Smith CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  4. In Re Carolina Steel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. Lillie Walker v. Collegetown Mobile Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API