Legal Opinion
Panavision International, L.P. v. Toeppen
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 19, 1996No. 96-3284 DDP (JRx)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT TOEPPEN’S MOTION TO QUASH THE SUMMONS AND DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
PREGERSON, District Judge.
Defendant Dennis Toeppen’s Motion to Quash the Summons and Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, brought pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), came before the Court on September 16, 1996. After reviewing and considering the materials submitted by the parties and hearing oral argument, the Court denies Toeppen’s Motion to Quash.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Panavision International, L.P. (“Panavision”) is a Delaware limited partnership with its…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Panavision International, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership v. Dennis Toeppen Network Solutions, Inc., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. v. Carefirst Pregnancy Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Realtime Gaming Holding Co., LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.