Legal Opinion

Simon et ux v. Board of County Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 11, 1987No. 86-C-10654; CA A39976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiffs sought a writ of mandamus to compel defendant (county) to approve their application for a permit to partition their land. The trial court dismissed the petition after concluding that plaintiffs filed it before the end of the 120-day period within which county had to take final action. The sole issue on appeal is on what date an application submitted to a county planning commission for a permit to develop land is “deemed complete.”

ORS 215.428 provides:

“(1) Except as provided in subsections (3) and (4) of this section, the governing body of a county or its designate shall take final…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cherry Lane, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simon v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Bigej Enterprises v. Tillamook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Bora Architects, Inc. v. Tillamook Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Simon v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Simon v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API