Mehta v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti
Plaintiff brought this action against defendant, John Hancock Insurance Company (John Hancock), and its agent, Jagdish Patel (Patel), to recover the proceeds of a life insurance policy insuring plaintiff’s deceased husband, Chinulal Mehta, in the face amount of $50,000. Plaintiff also sought damages for the alleged fraudulent and bad-faith rejection of the claim by John Hancock, resulting in emotional distress to her. Plaintiff appeals from orders granting summary judgment for both defendants based on a release she executed in exchange for return of the premiums paid. She contends she averred…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Fooden v. Board of GovernorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Wooding v. L & J PRESS CORP.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Castro v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Kalalinick v. KnollAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Life Insurance v. WilsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011