Legal Opinion

Donahoe v. Mitchem

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from the District Court of Canadian County; before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OE EACTS. An action by J. W. Mitchem against J ames Donahoe and Mary Donahoe in the district court of Canadian county for the possession of lots 13 and 14, block 78, in the city of El Beno; judgment for Mitchem; defendant in error brings case here by petition in error for review.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

BeauCHAMP, J.:

This was an action of unlawful de-tainer, commenced by J. W. Mitchem against James Donahoe and Mary Donahoe, to obtain restitution of lots 13 and 14, block 78, in the city of El Beno, before Ií. A. Franklin, justice of the peace in and for the city of El Beno. On application the venue was changed, and transcrijot 'duly certified to J. D. Connolly, the next nearest justice qualified to try the cause. Afterwards the plaintiff filed his affidavit and application for change of venue from the justice, J. D. Connolly, which was granted, and an order made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shy v. BrockhauseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  2. Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jenness v. JennessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API