Legal Opinion
State v. Arnold
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 11, 2001No. K99-742PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
801 So.2d 408 (2001)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Christopher ARNOLD.
No. K99-742.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
April 11, 2001.
Asa A. Skinner, Leesville, LA, Counsel for State of Louisiana.
Terry Lambright, Leesville, LA, Counsel for Defendant-Relator: Christopher Arnold.
Court composed of DOUCET, C.J., and THIBODEAUX and SAUNDERS, Judges.
THIBODEAUX, Judge.
The Defendant-Relator, Christopher Arnold, filed a post-conviction relief application from his guilty plea to the charges of attempted manslaughter, reduced from attempted second degree murder, and aggravated escape.[1] Denying his double…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ChessonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- State of Louisiana v. John R. ChessonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002