Legal Opinion

Erdman v. Chapel Hill Presbyterian Church

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2012No. 84998-6PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, C.J.

¶1 An employee of a church who maintains she was harmed by actions of a church’s minister brought numerous claims against the church and the minister. At this stage of the proceedings, the case involves her negligent retention, negligent supervision, and Title VII sex discrimination claims against the church. The Court of Appeals, reversing the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment, ruled that these claims are not barred by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as the trial court had determined.

*661¶2 We reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the trial court’s grant…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Certification From the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in Ockletree v. Franciscan Health SystemWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Doe v. Corporation of the Catholic Bishop of YakimaDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
  3. The Presbytery Of Seattle, Resps v. Jeff Schulz And Ellen Schulz, AppsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Ockletree v. Franciscan Health Sys.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Sprague v. Spokane Valley Fire Dep'tWashington Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API