Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2018No. C–170158PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Myers, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Lakisha Howell has appealed from the trial court's entry convicting her upon a no-contest plea to operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(a).

{¶ 2} In two assignments of error, Howell argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress based on both the alleged unlawful stop of her automobile and the alleged unlawful administration of field-sobriety tests. Because the stop of Howell's vehicle was not supported by probable cause or reasonable suspicion, we hold that the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. SlaughterOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. FosterOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. McDonaldOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. State v. SpellacyOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. GraysonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API