Friedlander v. Friedlander Bros.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
A motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions was made in this case. The defendant in the equitable petition filed an answer and cross-action. After the lapse of several,terms of court the defendant filed an amendment, asking that certain parties other than the original plaintiffs be made defendants in his cross-action. The court refused to allow the amendment, and refused to make the new parties. The only effect of this judgment was to refuse to allow an amendment to the cross-action of the original defendant. But neither the allowance nor the disallowance of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Development Authority v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Georgia Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Newnan HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Bird v. General Discount CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Georgia Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Newnan HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008