Legal Opinion

Friedlander v. Friedlander Bros.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 17, 1932No. 8562PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

A motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions was made in this case. The defendant in the equitable petition filed an answer and cross-action. After the lapse of several,terms of court the defendant filed an amendment, asking that certain parties other than the original plaintiffs be made defendants in his cross-action. The court refused to allow the amendment, and refused to make the new parties. The only effect of this judgment was to refuse to allow an amendment to the cross-action of the original defendant. But neither the allowance nor the disallowance of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wisconsin Development Authority v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Georgia Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Newnan HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Bird v. General Discount CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  5. Georgia Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Newnan HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API