Legal Opinion

State v. Fremont

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 2, 2008No. 06-1443PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

APPEL, Justice.

In this case, we consider whether the search and seizure provisions of the United States and Iowa Constitutions require the suppression of evidence obtained where a search warrant was approved by a magistrate who, at the time of the execu tion of the warrant, simultaneously represented a party in a family law proceeding adverse to one of the warrant’s named parties. We hold under the facts of this case that the magistrate was not “neutral and detached” as required by the Fourth Amendment and that the doctrine of harmless error does not apply. As a result, the motion to suppress…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. State v. LymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. State of Iowa v. Lee Allen BreuerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  5. In the Matter of Douglas A. KRULL, Judicial MagistrateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API