Legal Opinion
City of St. Louis ex rel. Esmar v. Tru-Bounce, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 24, 1978No. Nos. 37770, 37771PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Judge.
Action by the City of St. Louis at the Relation of Patrick M. Fiandaca III, Administrator C.T.M. D.B.N. of the Estate of William Esmar, deceased (plaintiff), against Tru-Bounce, Incorporated (Tru-Bounce), and Maryland Casualty Company (Maryland) as surety for Tru-Bounce, for monies due under a contract between Tru-Bounce as general contractor and William Esmar (Esmar) as subcontractor. A jury verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants. The verdict against Tru-Bounce was for $16,000, as the amount due under the contract and $1,600 as interest thereon.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bunting v. McDonnell Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Donnell v. Vigus Quarries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Union Electric Company of Missouri v. McNultySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Home Insurance Co. of New York v. SavageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
- United Farm Agency v. HowaldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Howard Construction Co. v. Teddy Woods Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Interstate Petroleum Distributors, Ltd. v. F & B Investments, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991