Legal Opinion

Paris Manufacturing Co. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1984No. 8 and 9 M.D. Appeal Docket 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

These are consolidated appeals from orders of the Commonwealth Court which affirmed1 resettlement orders of the Board of Finance and Revenue that increased the amounts of corporate income tax due the Commonwealth from the appellants, Paris Manufacturing Company and Doe Spun, Inc., each of which is a corporation engaged in business in this Commonwealth as well as in foreign jurisdictions. The tax increases arose pursuant to determinations by the Department of Revenue that appellants’ apportionments of business incomes between this and other juris*17dictions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hellertown Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. Greenville Steel Car Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Hellertown Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Paris Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Suburban Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Stonebridge Life Insurance v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2006
  3. Canteen Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Surgical Laser Technologies, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Hellertown Manufacturing Co. v. ScheinerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API